You and me could have a vampire romance
Sep. 17th, 2013 08:41 amThis book is terrible. However, it is also an absolutely perfect encapsulation of the deeply-embedded cultural narratives all the romances with hot, rich, creepily controlling vampires are tapping into: namely, that the world is full of natural human predators who deserve their position at the top of the social hierarchy, and that to survive you need to find a predator who will resist the urge to hurt you and will protect you from the other predators because he thinks you’re special.
...
For whatever reason, Harkness, Meyer, et al. find the tale of the frighteningly violent man who basically owns you but decides to protect rather than hurt you because you’re special appealing. Enough so to write book after book around the theme of, “He won’t treat me the way he treated those other women or the way he’s constantly threatening to treat me, because I’m different than the others, so really it’s like I have control! Slavery is freedom!” And literally immortal overlords literally sucking the life out of the less powerful for millenia? Means it will be totally romantic if one of them takes a liking to you and lifts you up to your “proper” station in life! There’s no need to question this setup’s moral foundations or ask if it could change. After all, they are stronger, faster, and more powerful than you, and the good ones won’t hurt you (much) if you just do as they say, so really it’s a pretty sweet deal even if you are just their ditch-digger or carpenter or whatever for your entire life with no hope of anything more, isn’t it? Isn’t it?
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 06:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 06:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 08:35 pm (UTC)And, while we are at it, this is preferable to the Cinderella myth exactly how?
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 08:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-18 09:52 am (UTC)DEAR GOD, I HATE ROMANTICIZED ABUSE. And I hate the fact that it's usually women writers telling other women this, too. And not just about vampires. Werewolves. Other shapeshifters. Fallen angels. Un-fallen angels. Demons. Sons of Lucifer. Fae. Aliens. Gods. And sometimes just human males, if they're nobility, in the right tax bracket, or both.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:34 am (UTC)I hate it so very much. And while logically I can see that telling these stories might be a coping strategy developed by women with few options through the ages, I don't think it's being understood used that way in the current market. At least I sure as hell hope not. The alternative, that it's being mindlessly pushed as an ideal, is terrifying.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-17 10:32 pm (UTC)It just hasn't been figured out quite yet, I think, and that is a shame because the current interpretation is perpetuating a lot of Bad Ideas about How Romance Ought to Be. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-18 06:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-18 12:31 am (UTC)Sidenote: I tried the audiobook version of this story. It was a good cure for insomnia. I accidentally skipped a CD and never noticed the difference due to the slow pacing.
I tried the sequel, but the issues you mentioned became even more grating when placed in Elizabethan London.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-18 02:33 am (UTC)"A person who is nice to you but rude to the waiter is not a nice person." - Dave Barry
"If a man is mean to other people, sooner or later he'll be mean to you." - James Marsters
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:39 am (UTC)And very nice quotes.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-18 01:40 pm (UTC)Then I realize the readers would STILL think the "romantic" vampire was the sexiest thing on toast and would fangirl-splain the results of the story into blaming the "heroine" (read: sucker) for not being QUITE perfect enough for him, but they TOTALLY would be if in the same situation!
(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-19 06:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-20 03:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-09-21 01:50 am (UTC)